How this policy works
This page explains the site rule that governs this area.
What can be reported
Readers may report an incorrect factual statement, wrong court attribution, broken official link, materially outdated procedural description or other specific issue through the Contact page.
What to include
A useful correction request identifies the page URL, the statement or link at issue, why it appears incorrect and, where possible, the current official source that supports the correction.
Review process
The reported point is checked against the most relevant official source. Where the issue is court-specific, the issuing court's current material takes priority.
Material corrections
If a statement can affect a user's understanding of procedure, timing, court identity or official source, the page should be repaired rather than leaving a known error in place.
Minor edits
Spelling, formatting, link-label or clarity improvements may be made without a separate correction notice when they do not change the substantive meaning.
Limits
A disagreement with a court order, law or procedural outcome is not an editorial correction. Case-specific legal disputes require appropriate legal or official channels.