Start with the official source
Use this guide to understand the task, then verify current or case-specific information on the relevant official court or eCourts system before acting.
Quick answer
Use the relevant court's official Contact, About or location page for the address. Court-complex names, districts and courtroom assignments are not interchangeable.
Supreme Court of India
The official Contact page lists the Registrar at Tilak Marg, New Delhi 110001.
Punjab and Haryana High Court
The official High Court contact page identifies the court at Sector 1, Chandigarh.
Patiala House and Saket
Delhi District Courts identifies Patiala House with New Delhi District and Saket with South/South-East court functions.
Gurgaon District Court
Use the official Gurugram District Court website for location and administrative information.
Visitor information that can change
Security arrangements, entry rules, courtroom numbers and facilities may change; verify them close to the visit.
Practical verification table
| Check | Practical rule |
|---|---|
| Address | Verify on the official Contact/About page |
| Court complex | Do not confuse with district name |
| Courtroom/bench | Treat as dynamic |
| Security/access | Check current instructions |
| Transport | Convenience information only |
Detailed research guide
This section expands the quick utility guidance above into a research-oriented workflow for Court Locations, Addresses and Visitor Information. The practical objective is to confirm the correct court complex and separate stable address information from changing visitor or courtroom details. The page is built around the user need: Find official court locations and visitor-information sources for Gurgaon, Delhi, Chandigarh and the Supreme Court of India. The main risk is Access, courtrooms and facilities can change. The desired outcome is straightforward: Use the correct official source and leave with a verified location or visitor-information conclusion.
For SEO/AEO purposes, the useful unit is not a repeated keyword but an answerable passage. The sections below therefore organize the topic around the researched facets, likely follow-up questions, official-source evidence and failure points. Where the subject is dynamic - for example case status, daily listings, court working information, bench allocation or filing progress - the live official record should be checked again close to the time of use.
Which official source should control?
The page research identified 5 primary official sources. Use the court-specific source first when the question concerns that court’s own record, and use eCourts or another official service when it is the designated lookup layer. Do not treat a search-engine snippet, old screenshot, cached PDF or third-party summary as a substitute for the current official record.
- Supreme Court of India - use the live official page to confirm current records, forms, listings, search fields or court-specific instructions relevant to this task.
- Punjab and Haryana High Court - use the live official page to confirm current records, forms, listings, search fields or court-specific instructions relevant to this task.
- Delhi District Courts - use the live official page to confirm current records, forms, listings, search fields or court-specific instructions relevant to this task.
- Delhi District Courts - use the live official page to confirm current records, forms, listings, search fields or court-specific instructions relevant to this task.
- Gurugram District Court - use the live official page to confirm current records, forms, listings, search fields or court-specific instructions relevant to this task.
What information should you have ready?
The research for this page identified the following dimensions as important. Not every official interface will ask for every field, but these are the details most likely to determine whether the search or verification succeeds:
- Check the official address dimension explicitly rather than assuming it from another field or from an older screenshot.
- Check the court complex dimension explicitly rather than assuming it from another field or from an older screenshot.
- Check the district mapping dimension explicitly rather than assuming it from another field or from an older screenshot.
- Check the transport/access dimension explicitly rather than assuming it from another field or from an older screenshot.
- Check the visitor contacts dimension explicitly rather than assuming it from another field or from an older screenshot.
- Check the dynamic courtroom information dimension explicitly rather than assuming it from another field or from an older screenshot.
Before searching, write down the exact court or court complex, any case/CNR/filing/diary/FIR identifier you have, the relevant year, the party names, and the date you are trying to verify. For court-specific pages, the entity context is Court Locations, Addresses and Visitor Information. Keeping these details together makes it easier to spot a false match and to switch search methods without losing track of which record you are trying to confirm.
A verification workflow that reduces false matches
- Start from the canonical court or official service identified on this page rather than from an unverified third-party page.
- Confirm the court, district, establishment, bench or court complex before entering the case details. This is especially important where several establishments use similar case types or where a court complex name is better known than the formal district name.
- Use the strongest available identifier first. A unique or structured identifier is usually easier to verify than a broad name search, but the appropriate identifier depends on the court and the stage of the matter.
- Open the result and match more than one field - for example parties, case type, year, court and procedural history. Do not rely on one familiar name alone.
- If the task is time-sensitive, cross-check the current cause list, roster, calendar or listing notice as appropriate. Operational court information can change after an earlier status entry or downloaded list.
- When the legal effect matters, read the underlying order, judgment, rule or notice. A portal label is a navigation aid, not a substitute for the controlling text.
How to interpret the location or visitor-information conclusion
Separate the stable address of the court complex from dynamic visitor information. Courtroom numbers, benches, counters, security arrangements and access routes can change; verify those details close to the visit even when the complex address itself is stable.
Common failure points and how to troubleshoot them
The research record identified specific gaps that can cause users to fail even when they reach an official website:
- Access, courtrooms and facilities can change.
- Users often mix district names with court-complex names.
| Problem | Safer response |
|---|---|
| No result appears | Recheck the court/establishment, case type, year and spelling. Then try the strongest alternative official identifier supported for that court. |
| Several similar results appear | Open the candidate case histories and compare parties, year, case type and court. Avoid selecting by a familiar surname alone. |
| The next date and the daily list seem different | Treat the daily cause list and any later listing notice as the operational source for the imminent appearance, while retaining the case history for procedural context. |
| A status entry is unclear | Open the linked order or the latest available judicial document rather than inferring legal meaning from the portal label. |
| A saved PDF or screenshot is old | Return to the live official source and repeat the search. Dynamic court information should be rechecked instead of assumed to remain unchanged. |
Freshness: when should you check again?
Freshness class F2: This topic can change through portal updates, practice directions, procedural instructions or court-specific search behavior. Recheck the official source when the page is used for a current matter and refresh the page periodically rather than treating the interface as permanent.
Freshness should also affect how the page is read. Stable explanation can be used to understand the process, while the live court source should control current dates, lists, roster assignments, fees, forms, filing instructions, contact details and other changeable information. This separation lets the page remain useful without pretending that a static article is the official record.
Research-derived decision aids
The research brief identified the following information-gain opportunities. They are included because they help users make a decision or verify a result, not because they increase page length:
- Six-court location matrix - use this as a practical checkpoint when moving from a search result to a verified court record.
- stable-vs-dynamic visitor information - use this as a practical checkpoint when moving from a search result to a verified court record.
- official contact routing - use this as a practical checkpoint when moving from a search result to a verified court record.
| If you know or need | Best next move | Verification |
|---|---|---|
| A structured case identifier | Use the corresponding official case-search field first. | Match parties, court, case type and year. |
| Only a party or advocate name | Use the official name-search route and narrow by court/year/status. | Open the candidate history; do not rely on the name alone. |
| An imminent hearing | Check case status and then the current cause list/listing notice. | Confirm court/bench, date and item/case details. |
| The legal effect of a court action | Open the actual order or judgment. | Verify date, case identity and official provenance. |
| A failed search | Change one variable at a time: establishment, identifier, year or search route. | Keep the known case facts constant while testing the official alternatives. |
Questions this page should answer
Where is the Supreme Court located?
Start with Supreme Court of India and follow the court-specific search or information path. Confirm that the page belongs to the correct court and that any date-sensitive information is current before relying on it.
Where is Punjab and Haryana High Court?
Start with Supreme Court of India and follow the court-specific search or information path. Confirm that the page belongs to the correct court and that any date-sensitive information is current before relying on it.
Where are Patiala House and Saket Courts?
Start with Supreme Court of India and follow the court-specific search or information path. Confirm that the page belongs to the correct court and that any date-sensitive information is current before relying on it.
Where is Gurgaon District Court?
Start with Supreme Court of India and follow the court-specific search or information path. Confirm that the page belongs to the correct court and that any date-sensitive information is current before relying on it.
Related tasks on LawyerInGurgaon.com
Court tasks rarely end with a single lookup. The related pages below are intended to keep the user on a clear task path without duplicating the same intent across multiple URLs:
Evidence and reliability note
This research layer was prepared from the page-specific structured research record dated 2026-09-12 and the official sources linked above. It intentionally avoids presenting a portal feature, listing, roster, date, fee, form or procedural setting as permanently fixed. If the live official source differs from this explanatory page, the live official source controls for current court information.